Thursday, December 1, 2016

The Christmas Prophecies

Related image

In his book, The Case for Christ, former Chicago Tribune journalist Lee Strobel presents the compelling evidence which caused him to abandon his long-held atheism for Christianity. One of the major arguments which convinced Mr. Strobel of the deity of Christ was His fulfillment of Messianic prophecy. He writes:
           
            “In many criminal cases, fingerprint identification is the pivotal evidence. I remember covering a trial in which a single thumbprint found on the cellophane wrapper of a cigarette package was the determining factor in convicting a twenty-year-old burglar of murdering a college coed. That’s how conclusive fingerprint evidence can be.
            In the Old Testament, there are several dozen major prophecies about the coming of the Messiah, who would be sent by God to redeem His people. In effect, these predictions form a figurative fingerprint that only the Anointed One would be able to match. This way, the Israelites could rule out any impostors and validate the credentials of the authentic Messiah.
            Against astronomical odds—one chance in a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion—Jesus, and only Jesus throughout history matched this prophetic fingerprint. This confirms Jesus’ identity to an incredible degree of certainty.”[1]

                                    Image result for The case for Christ

As you study the birth narrative of Christ, the Gospel writers make it abundantly clear that the Christ-child possesses the Messianic fingerprint that the Old Testament prophets foretold centuries in advance. Scholars have noted that there are over 300 prophecies concerning the first advent of Christ, all of which were fulfilled precisely. Consider just a few which pertain to Christmas:

·         Genesis 3:15, the first prophecy in the Bible, predicted that the Redeemer would be born of a woman. The text even hints at a virgin birth because it refers to the Redeemer as “the seed of the woman,” a curious phrase since the Hebrew mind regarded the “seed” of life to belong to the man. Somehow, this Redeemer would be conceived without the help of a man. This prophecy was fulfilled in Luke 2:7 and Galatians 4:4.   

·         Genesis 12:1-3 predicted that Messiah would be a descendant of Abraham. The fulfillment of this is found in Jesus’ genealogy recorded in Matthew 1:1.

·         Genesis 21:12 showed that the Messiah could trace his lineage through Abraham’s son, Isaac and then Numbers 24:17 added Jacob as well to the family tree. These are both fulfilled in Matthew 1:2.

·         Genesis 49:10 narrows the focus of the Messiah’s ancestry even more by predicting that He will come from the tribe of Judah, one of Jacob’s 12 sons. The fulfillment of this is made clear once again in Matt. 1:2-3.

·         Two prophecies show that the Messiah would have a legal claim to royalty as he would be a descendant of Jesse, the father of David—Israel’s first king (Isaiah 11:1; Jeremiah 23:5-6). The fulfillment of these specifications are found in Luke’s genealogy of Jesus (3:31-32) and in the angel’s announcement to Mary (Luke 1:32-33).

·         Daniel gave the exact timetable for the Messiah’s appearance (Dan. 9:25). According to this stunning prophecy the time for Messiah’s presentation to the nation would come 173,880 days from the day the decree was given for the Jewish people to return from captivity to rebuild their temple, which occurred on March 5, 444 BC. Moreover, Luke 2:1-2 sets the historical cross-hairs for the time of Jesus’ birth during the rule of Caesar Augustus.

·         Isaiah 7:14 predicted that the Messiah would be born of virgin. This was confirmed in the angelic announcement to Mary (Luke 1:26-27, 30-31).

·         Micah 5:2 foretold that the Christ would be born in the little town of Bethlehem. Caesar didn’t know it, but his decree for all subjects in the Roman Empire to return to their hometown to be counted for the census got Mary and Joseph from Nazareth to Bethlehem so this prophecy could be fulfilled in Luke 2:4-5, 7.

·         Psalm 2:7 said that Messiah’s identity as the “Son of God” would be announced at His birth. This is exactly the announcement made by the angels to Mary (Luke 1:32) and the shepherds (Luke 2:11).  

·         Jeremiah predicted a time when, because of Christ’s birth, many children would be slaughtered (Jer. 31:15). We see this transpire when King Herod, “The Butcher of Bethlehem,” killed the Jewish boys for fear of the newborn king (Matt. 2:16-18).

·         Hosea revealed many centuries in advance that Mary, Joseph and Jesus would have to flee to Egypt to escape the wrath of Herod (Hos. 11:1; Matt. 2:14-15).    

As you can see many of these prophecies would be impossible to fulfill by human manipulation or even blind chance. How could one cause himself to be virgin born? How could someone plan to be born in Bethlehem even though the family they chose lived in Galilee? How could anyone engineer their birth so that it would occur in a specific time and with a specific ancestry?  

So staggering are these fulfilled prophecies that one mathematician, Peter Stoner, calculated the chances of just eight of these being fulfilled by chance as one in 1017 (10 to the 17th power). That is one in 100,000,000,000,000,000. To help us comprehend this mind-boggling probability, Stoner illustrates with this analogy.



Imagine filling the state of Texas knee deep in silver dollars. Include in this huge number one silver dollar with a red “X” mark on it. Then, turn a blindfolded person loose in this sea of silver dollars. The odds that the first coin he would pick up would be the one with the red "X" are the same as eight prophecies being fulfilled accidentally in the life of Jesus.[2]       

Considering those amazing, but true facts, you would be a fool to conclude anything else than Bethlehem’s babe as the baffling intersection of deity with humanity.



[1] Lee Strobel, The Case for Christ (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1998), 172, 262
[2] Peter W. Stoner, Science Speaks (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1963), 107. 

No comments:

Post a Comment